Yesterday Abbott said:
“What the housewives of Australia need to understand as they do the ironing …”
I’ve not included the rest of the quote as in all articles it has been taken out of context and no longer makes any sense. And while his message was about climate change and ETS and taxes, that’s just not important to me right at this moment.
Today Abbott said those who were appalled by his reference to ironing housewives were “hypersensitive”. No media appeared to have a complete quote so that’s all we got. “Hypersensitive”. Oh, and apparently that’s how it’s done in his house. And it’s “more common to see women ironing”.
I’m pissed off anyway. I was annoyed yesterday to hear “what the housewives … need to understand” and I’m much more annoyed now I’ve been told I’m hypersensitive.
Sure, two words, “housewives” and “ironing” – they’re not that much to get hung up on. We hypersensitive few are being picky. But there’s a reason for it. These two words are putting women in their place. They’re saying women are meant to be doing the ironing. They’re implying women are meant to be housewives. These two words are pushing the stereotype. They’re making it bigger in a world where women already struggle to be seen as worthy.
Last week jeans were banned in my office. Two of my male colleagues (in their thirties) advised me that this meant I had to wear skits and heels and “start looking a bit feminine”. There was no joking. There was no ribbing. It simply did not occur to them at that exact point in time that women could wear pants.
I used to work with a woman who was denied a management position because she “might have children” and the position required travel. She did not submit a complaint. She decided it was too hard to bother trying to prove a spoken word.
It’s widely known that women are paid less than men across Australia. And apparently the pay gap widened last year.
Here’s the thing. I can’t come out and claim to be a feminist because, while that may be true, as soon as I do someone’s who has not met me will decide I’m a shaved-headed, big breasted, braless, stained tank top-wearing, forgets to shower for a week, man-hating, beefed-up Harley Davidson riding lesbian who burps the alphabet. And someone who has met me will wonder if I wish I was.
“Feminist” has been given a nasty slur these past few decades. Somehow people everywhere have decided it’s not a quest for equality. Instead, in their minds, it has become a bunch of anti-social lesbians asking the world to deem all women “better”. And the anti-feminist brigade were out in force in today’s press, commenting widely on the new.com.au article. My favourite has to be:
chris of perth Posted at 11:32 AM February 09, 2010
Abbott is a legend and I agree with his comments. A womens place is in the home, cleaning, cooking and most of all ironing. It seems to me, that todays woman is more like trying to be todays man.
News.com.au also ran a survey asking if Tony Abbott’s critics were being oversensitive. And here’s the final result:
Yes – just let him speak 70.59% (3223 votes)
No – he should be accountable 29.41% (1338 votes)
Total votes: 4561
I’d like to see the REAL results.
The first time I voted I seemed to get some awfully pretty numbers. I just happened to be the 2000th voter. So I tried again. And again. I got some wonderfully fanciful numbers. Unfortunately the screen shots of the last two are on my work computer. I’ll have to update this post with them tomorrow.
I’d like a little equality. I’d like a little less implication that women belong chained to the kitchen sink. I’d like people to be judged first upon their brains, their skills, their talent, and never by their gender.
Abbott’s not helping. Media’s not helping.
I’m sorry if this is a little ranty, a little rambly and a little non-sensical. I’m just trying to avoid getting on my “ARGH! FUCK YOU!” high horse.
I just want equality.
Thank you.
Edit:
Here are the screen shots from yesterday. When I first voted I was told the tally stood at:
Are Tony Abbott’s critis being oversensitive?
Yes – just let him speak 68.25% (1365 votes)
No – he should be accountable 31.75% (635 votes)
Total votes: 2000
Even, huh? I was vote 2000. And both camps ended in a “5″. Very neat. So I voted again:

My second vote, less than a minute later.

My third vote, less than a minute after my second
So… what’s the real result?